<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://penseenoir.wordpress.com/rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://penseenoir.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Born with a plastic spoon in his mouth...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fasttalkerchat</title>
		<link>http://penseenoir.wordpress.com/rights/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>fasttalkerchat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penseenoir.wordpress.com/?page_id=258#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Very good read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://penseenoir.wordpress.com/rights/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://penseenoir.wordpress.com/?page_id=258#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Very well put.

It&#039;s not a question of Human Freedom and Animal Rights, but of freedom for human and non-human animals. Something that WILL be taken and not begged for!!

One thing maybe to mention is that &quot;rights&quot; are defined for &quot;people&quot;, which so far includes humans and corporations. So begging for rights, is reinforcing the &quot;rights&quot; of corporations to not be campaigned against or &quot;harrassed&quot;, such as by obtaining SOCPA injunctions

More importantly though, this is just the beginning. First it was classified using &quot;harrassement&quot;, then it was &quot;blackmail&quot; (which ironically defines any direct campaign), next campaigners will probably be imprisoned for &quot;assualting&quot; companies if they cause any physcial damage.

As property destruction is defined as violent by most states, its clearly to (very soon) define such an attack as &quot;assault&quot;, to increase potential sentences for political prisoners. What next, &quot;attempted murder&quot;?? There&#039;s no reason why not, corporations are now &quot;people&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well put.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a question of Human Freedom and Animal Rights, but of freedom for human and non-human animals. Something that WILL be taken and not begged for!!</p>
<p>One thing maybe to mention is that &#8220;rights&#8221; are defined for &#8220;people&#8221;, which so far includes humans and corporations. So begging for rights, is reinforcing the &#8220;rights&#8221; of corporations to not be campaigned against or &#8220;harrassed&#8221;, such as by obtaining SOCPA injunctions</p>
<p>More importantly though, this is just the beginning. First it was classified using &#8220;harrassement&#8221;, then it was &#8220;blackmail&#8221; (which ironically defines any direct campaign), next campaigners will probably be imprisoned for &#8220;assualting&#8221; companies if they cause any physcial damage.</p>
<p>As property destruction is defined as violent by most states, its clearly to (very soon) define such an attack as &#8220;assault&#8221;, to increase potential sentences for political prisoners. What next, &#8220;attempted murder&#8221;?? There&#8217;s no reason why not, corporations are now &#8220;people&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
